|
Irv
Lee's FAQ,FGA Page
|
|
|
|
Recent (2006) Member of the CAA's Air Infringement Working Group (AIWG) Appointed Site Adminstrator/Webmaster for GASCo's "Fly on Track" Site Member of the CAA's Air Infringement Working Group (AIWG) Elected an Upper Freeman by the Guild Of Air Pilots and Navigators |
|
Keep thinking 'flying' even when you are not - with either a PPL Masterclass Seminar (Register interest early, get influence on the place and date!) or the "Rust Remover for Pilots" DVD with great reviews by pilots and students who can't fly as often as they'd like. If you like the Questions and Answers which follow, you'll love ... |
Click for more details!
|
So what do you suppose that means...? "You learn from your mistakes...." Well, that's NOT the way it has to be any more... New PPL or been flying for years? Well advanced Student? Learned abroad or UK? It doesn't matter - you'd find it hard not to enjoy and benefit from a PPL Masterclass |
|
|---|
|
Details/Order Online? Click DVD above!
Click here for demo |
You know you don't fly often enough, you know how rusty you feel! For 10 years I've been derusting pilots after lay-offs and most of them show the same mistakes, forget the same things, etc. This DVD can be watched before you go flying, and you can see (and recognise) the rust! Pre-flight planning tips too. If owning and watching this DVD can save you just 15 minutes of de-rusting time once at today's rental prices, it will more than worth it. Order yours now, using plastic or cheque. Quote: (The Loop): "... can see this being played in Clubrooms up and down the country"Quote: (Pilot Magazine): "... packed with advice, refreshing relevant in-flight cockpit and air to air filming." |
To learn more, or to order online, (Credit or Debit Cards), click on the yellow image above |
- If you need a good aide-memoire, written by a G.A. pilot for G.A. pilots,
on all the rules, legalities and safety tips you need to consider before a flight in the UK, consider the
Pre- Preflight Checklist as favourably
reviewed in Flyer, Pilot Magazine, International Flight Training, AOPA's Light Aviation
and GASCO's Flight Safety Review. Click on the yellow front page icon here on the left.
A "must" for anyone trained in the US, and invaluable for UK qualified and student pilots! |
|---|
| Help for UK pilots planning vacations in South Africa |
"3 Products for your S. African Vacation" are now
available for online purchase:
SA On a PPL - summarising the points any UK based pilot needs to understand before arriving in South Africa for a vacation which involves some fun flying down there. "AVIMAP" - the SA Chart and Flight Guide Book "Pilot Destinations"- the Holiday Guide and Flight Guide to Lodges and Game Parks with airstrips |
Disclaimer: These answers have no legal authority and could be superceded or become wrong or redundant
at any time. Use these answers only as a base starting point for checking with the relevant authorities.
If the questions below are the sort you feel you need the answers to, or similar ones on any other type of
flying, then
you'll probably enjoy and benefit from the monthly "Flying Doctors" feature in
Flyer Magazine.
If it's the National PPL you're interested in, take a look at
NPPL FAQs
Many pilots prefer to browse through them all in turn, but
to jump to a generalised contents list, click here
The basic rule is:
Reading these, it is fairly obvious that
As for IFR flight, well firstly make sure you know what you mean by that
(See FAQ17 above).
There's no real point in thinking about this until you know the real meaning of VFR and IFR.
(A simple glossary of common abbreviations
is (very) slowly being developed, thanks to a suggestion on the Flyer Fora).
Apologies for resisting a direct link to click upon for contact, but I have been getting 1000s of unwanted
items per day. You can get in touch by checking the business card on the home page above, or use the 'higherplane/flyer/co/uk address prefixed by 'mail@'
and obviously 'dots' where the 'slashes' are.
Site visitor: The Qs and the As:
Easy - search by town, region or partial postcode
on this AME Search Site.
If you are a S.A. PPL holder looking for a S.A. approved AME, I maintain these contact details:
S.A. AMEs in the UK. (If you
know of any more, they can be added for free!)
It's probably not as bad as you expect, You do need a test with an examiner, but
any retraining is at your discretion providing it is not 5 years since the lapse.
Re-training in these circumstances can be at an unlicensed airfield - I do it at Popham.
See Training by Irv Lee.
The test is something like a good club rental checkout, but since late October 2004
has had to include a navigation secton too, This nav leg need not be as long as the initial PPL
skills test's navigation leg. There is however a pass/fail on the whole test..
Anything can be in the general handling parts, but
expect the usual various Stalls, 45 degree steep turns, 'emergencies' (PFL, EFATO), and normal, glide and flapless circuits.
Under 5 years elapsed and once you have passed your check with an examiner, you will be signed up
as legal again there and then.
The situation also changed in 2002 for expiries greater than 5 years. Before there were big
difference if you had let 5 years or 10 years elapse - there used to be log book submission and
training assessment by the CAA prior to retraining. (After 10 years you had to do the
ground exams again too.) Now, in either case, you just do a bit of retraining as required by your
'CFI' and take the same test as the pilots 'under 5 years' elapsed. However, your paperwork will be
assessed (post test) by the CAA and signed off by them before you can fly (and of course they want a fee).
In the past, certificates used to be back-dated by the CAA in this sort of case after examination of the log book,
but the latest information is that this is no longer the case under JAR.
If all requirements - including getting the final signature - are not completed by expiry,
a test to renew the rating is required from an examiner, as per the question above.
This seems rather Draconian, especially if all
requirements of FAQ9 below, but it is the latest stance.
If you fly without the required sign off,
you could be in real trouble if there is any incident. Don't risk it!
Providing you obey the restrictions of your licence, it is fully valid (eg: sign-offs, medical, etc), and UK Air Law
and stick to a private VFR flight in UK Airspace, you do not need to convert your licence. You can probably do more than
this on your foreign licence, but the answer is more complicated. S.African PPL holders must stick to their
exact approved types. (You can now get a different type rating with me, but a JAR or UK instructor cannot sign you off
on a new type - forms need to go to Pretoria for every new type flown - even a C150 cannot be flown by a South
African PPL who only has a C172 rating. I have S.A. qualifications and can convert you legally.)
If you learned abroad, you probably need a UK instructor to
brief you well on UK Air Law, and maybe to
'ride shotgun' for a couple of cross-country flights in the UK. It would be well worth looking at
the Pre- Preflight Checklist which takes you
through all the legalities and tips before making a flight in the UK. If you want to convert
to a JAA PPL, see Q&A 25 below.
Well, VFR itself is an international agreement, so technically everywhere allows VFR above cloud unless
it is locally banned or your licence stops you doing that. Unfortunately, the answer to the question asked is:
No - VFR flight above cloud may be legal for some but NOT for you. Your UK issued PPL is restricted by the Air
Navigation Order on a world wide basis to flight in sight of the surface ONLY, where-ever you are, whatever the VFR rules.
Your minimum visibility is 3000 metres. Your UK issued PPL is restricted by the Air
Navigation Order to flight in visibility of 3000 metres or more, whatever the VFR rules. IMC/IR privileged pilots
could claim to be VFR down to those lower limits in the VFR table, but not you as a simple PPL. (Who wants
to fly in even 3000 metres anyway!?)
The best way to understand this is to regard your rating as permission to fly SOLO (ie: totally alone)
for its 2 year validity.
For non-solo flight, on the day you want to take passengers,
you must have been the handling pilot during 3 take offs and 3 landings in an aircraft covered by that
rating (in any loggable capacity, eg: P1 or under
training, with or without passengers) in the previous 90 days. If your flight includes any flying at night, one
take off and one landing of the
3 must have also been at night unless you have an Instrument Rating. Note that if you only fly a multi engined aircraft every day for 90 days, all
those take offs and landings and experience counts for nothing for taking passengers in a single engine aircraft under this rule.
(See also Q19 and Q26)
This is usually a syndicate rule problem. A member, fully legal in both medical and rating terms, lapsed on the
90 day rule,
fails syndicate rules by not flying for a while, and needs a checkout before flying the syndicate aircraft.
Under syndicate rules the member needs a syndicate checkout, but the 'failed' member cannot fly the
aircraft legally with a passenger, due to the 90 day rule, so cannot take the 'checker'..
Remember, legally, the member can fly the aircraft solo - it is only syndicate decided rules which stop it.
So here are 3 suggestions - choose one of these - it's not up to me to choose for you as I don't know your synducate
rules or what you require. I recommend Option 2, as it is the only clear, minimum risk option. Option 1
may have an extra risk, but may not, if for example the pilot has been flying light multi aircraft regularly.
Option 3 may not be possible under insurance or as a practicality:
Well if you don't want a test, you look in your licence at the Certificate of
Experience (early ones have the designation Form FCL 150 CJAR at the bottom, later ones don't), and in the final
year of the two year validity, you must complete 12 hours personal flying in S.E.P. aircraft (or
Touring Motor Gliders (TMG) if you happen to have a TMG rating too). The 12 hours MUST include:
The Signature to extend your rating on the Certificate of Experience
(form FCL 150 CJAR, as it was designated in early versions) must be done by "an Examiner", not just any instructor.
All flight examiners can do this, but there are also people around known as 'R' or 'GR'
Examiners who are approved to sign the C of E but are not Examiners for flight tests. This signature is part of
the process - if you do not get this C of E form signed BEFORE it expires, you have wasted doing the
12 hours - you will need a test just because you let the form expire without getting it signed in advance- even though you met all the other
(flying) requirements!
The best thing to do is if you are using the '12 hour by experience' route
detailed above, once all flying requirements are met, as soon as you are within 3 months of expiry,
ask an examiner for a rating revalidation signature - don't wait for the expiry date as you may
have problems finding an examiner.
When using the 12 hour route, this
final signature (according the JAR) can be had at any time once flying requirements have been met, but in 2004 someone
noticed that the UK ANO had been updated to say the final signature to complete the revalidation had to be
in the final 3 months of the existing rating. As the UK ANO over-rides JAR, that means that you have to wait for
the final 3 months to get the revalidation paperwork done, even if you completed all the flying requirements
months before.
Just for example, if you completed
all 'by experience' flying requirements including the flight with an instructor in months 13 and 14 of a
2 year rating, you now have to wait for months 21 to 24 to ask an examiner for the final signature to
finish the revalidation process.
NO - you lose nothing doing it at any time in the second year, and meeting the requirements in any order.
If you wait, you'll find weather or maintenance issues conspire against you and you won't get it done. When you
have met all the requirements for revalidation, even if your rating still has months to run, you can get
signed up in advance so that your expiry date is extended by another 2 years beyond
that original date, thereby wasting nothing. (See previous question if you want to know who can sign
you up for another 2 years)
NO - if these different aircraft are all in the Single Engine Piston (land) class,
then you add together any experience on any of them - they are all 'the same thing' as far as the 2 year class rating is concerned,
unless they have a specific type rating like
the Piper Malibu. You don't even have to do a single flight in any particular one of these 'variants'
- if you did all your '12 hours' requirements in a simple Cessna 150, getting your S.E.P. rating
signed off again covers you for all your S.E.P. aircraft for another 2 years,
whatever their propellors or wheels do.
Equally, if your 12 hours consisted of some sort of 'mix',
eg: 4 hours on a Cessna 150, 6 hours in a Cub (taildragger), 2 hours in a 'retractable' Piper,
there's no difference (other than the fun factor), this mix also meets the 12 hour requirements for
S.E.P (land) Class.
Same applies for the 90 day passenger rule - all experiences within a class add up together.
Look at your 'expiry date' on the certificate of experience (form FCL 150 CJAR) in your licence. One way to revalidate is to wait until
you have under 3 months to go, and then have
a proficiency checkflight with an examiner - a sort of mini-GFT similar to a good rental checkout
but since Oct 2004 this has included a navigation leg too. Your original expiry date
would then be extended by the 2 years.
You can actually do this one flight (the proficiency check with an examiner) at any time, but if it is not in the final 3 months
before expiry, your rating will be renewed from the date of test, not the date of original expiry. One
thing to note is that if you abandon the 12 hour route to take this test and FAIL, you cannot fly again as
pilot in command until you have passed a re-test, so the 12 hour route effectively disappears if you take
the test and fail.
You have to undergo a special Flight Instructor Course ("FIC") with an FIC Instructor, to become a restricted flight
instructor, teaching under the supervision of an unrestricted one. You could not charge for tuition until you
have a Commercial Licence. (An old BCPL counts). The FIC course involves
30 hours flying (some simulator possible, talk to the chosen school)
plus 125 hours groundschool (some of that is "directed self tuition"). The test is gruelling
- maybe 90 minutes in the air (including spinning) and about 3 to 4 hours being grilled on the ground.
There are pre-requisites to the course, namely:
In daytime, as a basic PPL, the circumstances where you would want a Special VFR Clearance
for Class D or E Airspace are extremely rare - so rare you can almost forget Special VFR. In Class D or E it
is almost just a procedural device to get around certain laws. For example, it allows an IMC rated pilot to fly
in a VFR-like way when the visibility is less than the 5 km minimum for VFR (but at least 3km).
There are reasons for a basic PPL to use
Special VFR - see next question.
Accepting that you hardly ever need it, if you did ask for it, either in ignorance or deliberately,
you force the controller to separate you from other
SVFR or IFR traffic by a certain distance. This sounds like a great idea, but isn't, as the controller will
NOT provide any separation at all from other VFR traffic.
It will also probably delay you considerably, as for your departure, the controller will keep you on the
ground when any IFR or SVFR traffic is around, or make you orbit at VRPs if you are arriving, whilst separation is maintained from
IFR or SVFR traffic around the airfield.
For the normal PPL holder, VFR minimum visibility in Class D is 5 kilometres, but for Special
VFR it is DOUBLE that - you need 10 kilometres minimum to remain legal, If you are a basic PPL, unless you
really understand Special VFR, you should only ask for it in the circumstances detailed in the next question.
Well, as a basic PPL, subject to a 10 kilometres or more visibility:
Yes, subject to:
Firstly, are you sure you understand the question? IFR is probably one of the most
misunderstood concepts for UK pilots as the term IFR is used differently
in the UK to other countries, but as you will see, it doesn't actually matter in practice. Recent JAR changes have caused some confusion, as it
appears that the committee who drafted JAR also didn't really understand how IFR is used in the UK.
Your UK licence
is a licence to fly - you won't find mention of VFR or IFR in it.
On a simple PPL, the Air Navigation Order stops you flying IFR in classes "A through E" controlled airspace, leaving
"F" and "G" ('the Open FIR' to use an old term). (Note for American pilots:- we have enormous expanses of Class "G"
in the UK which is not 'topped' by Class "E" as it is in the USA). So, a PPL holder, or for that matter
a student pilot can fly 'IFR' in Class F or G airsapce in the UK. Surprised? Well, here's why:
UK G.A. pilots often confuse 'IFR' with 'flying in IMC' (eg: in cloud), or sometimes, also wrongly, with
"flying commercially" or "flying in airways".
It's actually not any of those, IFR or VFR are just the rules you decide to adopt for the flight. Consider it is a
completely clear blue sky day, and you are in an aircraft which is legally capable of IFR flight (altimeter, gyro
instrument, non-permit operation) and you are in Class G airspace.
Notice there was nothing about being on a commercial flight, or being in poor visibility,
or being under radar, or in airways, or even talking to anyone -
in the UK it's just what you are (or are not) guaranteeing to others that you will do regarding altitudes and
headings.
As you will see from this, the misunderstanding that basic PPL holders cannot fly IFR in good weather in Class G
means that the UK pilot always flies VFR by default, guaranteeing "nothing to no-one",
so the misunderstanding spreads to the point where if you actually talked about flying IFR, fellow pilots would
almost always assume you meant that you were "in IMC" - eg: in cloud.
When
visibility deteriorates to conditions where VFR is no longer allowed (ie: IMC), you would not have a choice,
and would have to go 'IFR', EXCEPT THAT your basic licence does not cover you for flights in those conditions, (in fact,
never below 3000 metres visibility or out of sight of the surface), so the question of IFR or VFR is meaningless.
I don't recommend you suddenly start declaring you are flying IFR on a sunny blue day just because you suddenly
realise you can. However, a daytime example of why you might want to fly IFR is to 'beat' the VFR cloud separation rules above
3000'. If you are in Class F or G, above 3000', and you cannot maintain the
standard separation vertically (or horizontally) from cloud which VFR demands, but you are still clear of cloud and in
sight of the surface, and in visibility of 3km or more, (both of which are requirements on a PPL holder imposed
by the Air Navigation Order at all times), you can adopt Instrument Flight Rules pressure setting, headings and flight
levels, and legally fly "IFR" providing you stay clear of cloud, in sight of surface, a minimum vis of 3km and
stay outside controlled airspace.
If you still dont believe a UK PPL can fly 'IFR' (the confusion is so endemic this happens!), then ask yourself
how a PPL flies at night (assuming a night qualification is held). There are only 2 ways to fly in Class G:
IFR or VFR. There is no VFR at night in the UK in any airspace. If you are flying outside controlled airspace
at night in the UK, there is nothing else except IFR (and the associated
heading / height / obstacle clearance noted above). I still meet pilots with night qualifications who don't know this, usually becuase their instructors didn't understand
the concept either!
They relate solely to visibility and 'lowest level of cloud desginated "Scattered" or worse'. As they are
designed for military pilots they concentrate at the 'difficult end' to help distinguish between different
conditions for instrument approaches. G.A. pilots should be wary of GREEN (which sounds good!) as it
is not brilliant and could even be illegal in the Class "D" airspace around some military bases. My graphic
showing the definition is here:
Military METAR Colour Codes.
White and Blue are the ones to interest general hobby flying, but remember they do not cover 'winds' in any
way, and do not appear on forecasts (TAFs) although they might be quoted verbally in forecast context.
No - if you have night qualifications then you can legally fly solo at night for the whole of the validity of
your normal rating - so if you have a Single Engine Piston (Land) rating valid for 2 years and a night
qualification, then that is valid at night too for all that time for solo flight.
The only snag comes when you want to take passengers. The 90 day rule applies, (see item 7 above) and you must have done 3 take offs
and 3 landings in the previous 90 days to take passengers, and for night flight, one of each of those must have been
at night. So you might have to do a quick solo circuit before taking passengers unless you meet the 90 day rule.
There are 5 features in JAR which make an SEP aircraft a 'complex variant', and 6 for the equivalent
in the UK NPPL. The first time you fly an aircraft
with one or more of the following, you need signed-off successful training for that feature from an Instructor.
The content of the training is not defined - it just has to be relevant and sufficient to satisfy the instructor.
So if you were trying to fly a tailwheel aircraft for the first time, you might expect a few hours, but if
it were just a retractable undercarriage, then nothing like that amount of time - a little groundwork looking at
speeds and emergency procedures, mainly circuit work in the air, and a little
time outside to demo 'warning horns' and a surprise PFL to see if you remembered the wheels,
then some induced distraction as you rejoin just
to see if you remember again in the circuit - anything relevant.
If you have flown a complex feature a long time ago, legally you still can without any re-training - do
you want to?
For retractable gear, maybe, maybe not - for tailwheel, I think you might
need some refreshing with an instructor!
SEE ALSO Number 12 - these hours in any SEP Variant all add together towards your SEP hours for revalidation
or the 90 day passenger rule.
Overhead joins, given a high enough cloudbase, are the best way to join the circuit at a non-controlled field. If
traffic joins at other points (crosswind, downwind, base, even final approach), then there are multiple points
of potential conflict. By everyone joining overhead, this reduces to one place.
Well, the 12 hours and take-offs and landings should be no trouble,
but your hour long instructor flight needs to be with an instructor from a JAA aligned State. This is a fairly
recent decision and is bound to cause a lot of problems for people in places like Canada, the USA away from the
usual JAR schools.
It's not even quite as simple as getting a JAA instructor who is passing by to give you the hour's flight. As he
or she will be 'p1', not you, he or she will have to comply with whatever the local country wants to be allowed
to be 'p1' in a local aircraft.
If you manage to get all your revalidation done, you may need to send the paperwork off to the CAA at Gatwick
to get your rating revalidated on the ratings form in your licence (early version were called FCL 150CJAR).
Nowadays, YES. The CAA will provide a sticker for your medical to say so, should you need to show the medical to
anyone who couldn't easily check (eg: to FAA authorities whilst flying in the US on vacation).
No, there's no official designation you could use in this case, you are merely a passenger.
If you just want to record the flight for posterity for some reason,
you could put it in your logbook and designate it
PASSENGER rather than P1 or P2 but you mustn't put any time at all into the columns
which 'total up'.
Before any flight, it must be clear who is pilot in command. This pilot logs the time as P1.
It is permissible for the role to be swapped sometime in the flight, but you can never
double log the P1 time. eg: An 80 minute
flight normally ends up being all 80 minutes P1 to one person, but by agreement it could be (say) 50 to one
and 30 to the other. You decide between you, as long as you both know who is in command at any moment, sharing the
time is ok as long as it is not double logged. If two qualified pilots are both sitting with controls, not only
discuss who is P1 but also who will deal with emergencies such as EFATO. Without the discussion, it is very
easy to get confusion at the very moment when there is no time for discussion.
Logging P2 is reserved for flights on aircraft which are designated
as requiring two pilots at all times, so any p2 logging on normal GA SEP aircraft is a nonesense.
The other confusion which is very widespread is the logging of P1 (Pi/c) and P1/s (or Pic/us) for rental or syndicate
checkouts. Many instructors log P1 to themselves and tell the pilot being checked out to log p1/s just for a rental
checkout. This is SO endemic in the hours-building world, no-one bothers to read up on it.
If you want to read up on it, try LASORS, the 'bible' for interpretting regulations. In there you
will find a large table of 'when to log what' but don't read it before looking a the footnotes.
You'll find out from the footnote that of all the cases listed for P1/s (Pic/us), the only one
approved for use by PPLs
is logging by a PPL is the 'successful test with an examiner', or specific flights pre-authorised by the CAA.
If you have P1/s (or Pic u/s) in your
log book and it was for a rental or syndicate checkout, not a test with an examiner, have a think about what made you decide to log it like
that way. (Logging is your responsibility.)
Was it you after reading LASORS, or was it because 'everyone does it' or you were told
by someone who would benefit from taking the P1 time themselves? What happens if you log p1/s today and in 6
months time the CAA decides that p1/s hours on a rental (or maybe more likely, syndicate checks) is not what they meant by
a test and tell examiners clearly that it should not count? (When I applied for Instructor Revalidation in 2001, my log book was checked that I was not
including P1 hours on these pure rental checks as instructional training hours.)
For rental checkouts, if the renter is fully legal to fly, I log nothing and the
renter logs P1 for the whole of the checkout, but then I'm not hours building! We just have a pre flight agreement that
Pilot In Command transfers to me should I need to say "I have control".
Well, are you sure you want to? (See Q and A number 4 above). Many pilots fly quite happily in the UK
on their foreign licences, keeping them valid. The reasons you might decide you want a JAA PPL are to get
a higher UK rating eg: an IMC rating, or you might not be able to renew your foreign licence here and have to go back
to your licence country every one or two years (eg: NZ and Australian licence holders have this problem, where-as
US and South African licence holders can get renewals in the UK.)
Anyway, whatever the reason, to convert the PPL, you would need to:
(You can do the ground exams and/or Skills Test and or Radio tests with me if you want.)
footnote: A new amendment to LASORS (the CAA interpretation of rules) recently
suggests that an expired foreign PPL (up to 5 years expired) with 100 hours total time can convert as above,
but with extra further training devised by the JAA school. LASORS seems to leave expired foreign PPLs with less
than 100 hours in limbo, but I believe this is an error in LASORS (a missing 'asterisk' on a paragraph)
and conversion to a JAA PPL is possible. Contact
me for the latest on this if you are in this situation (ie; foreign PPL expired less than 5 years, less than 100 hours total time)
as I have been in touch with the CAA about this, and I'm getting positive replies!)
Just think - after a 'touch and go', ask yourself if you landed the aircraft? How can the answer not be "yes"?
Then ask yourself if you took off again? How can the answer not be "yes" again?
(Also, can you
imagine trying to convince a local council planning authority that had put a maximum limit on aircraft movements that a
'touch and go' was NOT a landing followed by a take off?)
A touch and go is definitely one landing followed by one take off for 90 day or
SEP/TMG revalidation purposes. If you are told otherwise, it was probably
either by the person charging you for aircraft rental (full stops take longer) or it was someone confusing this
issue with the night qualification training (prior-, not post-issue). Where either JAR or the law wants
full stop landings, this is specifically stated in the regulation. There is no requirement to 'full stop' in
the 90 day or revalidation requirements.
Valid in the UK (and Channel Islands):
No privileges are conferred for Class A CTAs or Airways.
You might want to look at the official NPPL site
, but also, as the page you are looking at now
assumes you have a JAR PPL with SEP rating, I have created similar FAQ page for the NPPL -
click on this: NPPL-FAQ
Obviously if you spend a fortune and kit out with the latest fm-immune everything, then you can't go wrong (just
broke). If you don't upgrade at all, my reading is that for normal light aircraft, Comms do not enter the argument. For IFR I believe it is
clear - if you depend on VOR or ILS localisers, your equipment must be FM-immune. For VFR operation
they do not need to be. Here's my background (less intelligible) reason for why I come to that conclusion.
Assuming your aircraft is OK for IFR (eg: non-permit, the correct equipment for the airspace)
and your aircraft is 5700kg or below in mtow, then
there are conditions where you can fly under either set of flight rules with non fm-immune equipment.
FM immunity rules theoretically only affect
COMMS (VHF), VOR and ILS localisers. (In practice my personal opinion is that it doesn't affect anything!).
There are (at least) two documents worth looking at, and I have drawn my conclusion from these:
CAA AIC on FM Immunity
AIC 87/2000 PINK 7.
CAA Airworthiness Directive
issued autumn 2000 - see bookmark 84.
- the CAA are not worried about COMMS but reserve the right to change their minds.
- VFR flight is permitted using non-FM immune NAV-COMMS (providing it
is known not to be FM immune through a placard).
Outside Controlled Airspace, for UK IFR flight, there is no actual requirement to have or to use VORs, ILSs or Comms,
so whether you are flying IFR in IMC or IFR in VMC, then obviously some IFR flight without fm-immune Nav equipment
is quite possible. I see the use
of non-fm immune NAV equipment outside Controlled Airspace in the same way I see GPS usage -
if it's switched on and I am not depending on it, then it can be used as a secondary aid.
(If my 'primary aid' outside
Controlled Airspace on a particular flight is 'dead reckoning', and my 'dead reckoning' happens to take me straight along
a VOR radial, then that is my business!)
Inside controlled airspace the situation changes. Comms are again not a problem, but IFR (and therefore
IFR approaches) using non-fm immune VOR or ILS localiser equipment is not allowed.
I don't see any problem IMC training in any airspace where it is allowed with non-fm immune nav equipment
providing you stick to VMC and VFR, carrying out the same approach as you would under IFR in IMC.
However, it is clear from the two references that real life approaches (IFR in IMC) cannot be made in
Controlled Airspace if they depend on non fm-immune
Nav kit. That leaves such things as SRA, PARs, NDB/DME, etc. for IFR in Controlled Airspace.
Looking elsewhere in the Air Navigation Order, IFR in controlled airspace requires a certain kit fit, (which includes
VORs etc) but the ANO gives provision for Air Traffic to approve certain approaches for aircraft
with less than the full list but sufficient for the approach in question.
Personal opinion: It is totally ridiculous that my friends with a syndicate at Southampton (Class D) have to
come back and do SRAs and NDB/DME approaches in IMC to remain 'legal', when these apporaches are far less accurate and less safe than those use
perfectly performing (non-immune) ILS and VOR indicators!
Complex aircraft (tailwheel, retractable, constant speed props, pressurisation, turbo/supercharged)
were originally meant to be flown every 2 years to keep the ability to fly them in future, and I believe
the AIC on this says so. However, soon after the AIC came across, a JAR NPA (I think it was NPA 7) decided
that for SEP aircraft, once you were complex qualified, you remained qualified on SEP aircraft even if you
didn't fly the complexity every 2 years. Therefore, once 'retractable qualified', you remain so on SEP aircraft
whilst you have an SEP rating. (The NPA was incorporated into the JAR which the Air Navigation Order 'points' at.)
According to the AIC 3/2004 (white 92)
issued January 8th 2004 it seems that a JAR SEP rating can be used on microlights and SLMGs after signed
off differences training. This is contrary to advice the CAA used to give out, that a GFT is needed.
The AIC can be found at your flying club or on
the AIS Online Website (free registration required).
A JAR medical's validity period is based on the age you were when it was issued, not the age you are at the time of
using it! Therefore you would get a full 2 years if it was issued just before your 50th birthday. However, for some
reason this does not
apply to pilots getting 5 year medicals coming up to their 30th Birthdays - their '5' year period will not be allowed
to go beyond their 32nd birthday. Validity periods are currently in
this CAA document, but I suspect some Class One
validity periods might get more liberal in 2006, especially for over 40s.
Generally you need:
1- Documents specified by the ANO as you are in a G-reg aircraft (see below)
2- Documents otherwise needed - even if you weren't in an aircraft. eg: Passport
3- Documents a foreign country may want in addition to our ANO requirements. eg: VAT receipt, insurance, log book, or
maintenance Release to Service.
The ANO requirements are (for private flights, in addition to those required for internal flights):
and if you are in a 'permit' aircraft, (take the 'permit') or perhaps you are flying on an ICAO licence from a 3rd country, do not
go unless you are sure you have permission from the foreign authority, whether that permission is specific or 'blanket'
(as it is from time to time for taking G-reg permit aircraft to France). You might be used to the French
'blanket' permission for PFA permit home-builds, but did you know Belgium wants to be asked about
permit aircraft each time, and also wants a pre-paid fee for permission?
If you had an aircraft registered in the same country as your PPL and I/R, you could really fly anywhere (in
whatever airspace) you wanted. If, as per Q&A 4, you mean in a UK ("G-registered") aircraft, that would give you some of
the privileges of an IMC rating, but not all. It would allow IFR flights OUTSIDE controlled airspace in the UK
(ie: Classes F and G), but you could not fly IFR inside controlled airspace (Classes A to E), where-as an
IMC holder could do so in all but Class A,
If you have a CAA or JAA PPL too, and you get an ICAO compliant Instrument Rating, the CAA will usually
add an IMC rating to your CAA or JAA PPL if you apply to them for it.
You should be able to count up to 10 hours towards your 45 for the JAA PPL, although this statement seems to have
disappeared from the rules - check with the UK CAA. However, if you can prove the training
was done towards an ICAO PPL and you have copies of your training record from
your original school abroad, a recent change says that if you completed a training towards an
ICAO PPL but the licence was not issued,
then you can send all your training records to the UK CAA for assessment, and they will devise a training requirement to
count these to a JAA PPL. It will definitely include the full Skills Test, all the ground exams, the radio
tests, and as well as any other training needed, and what is called the 'Qualifying Cross Country' flight where as
a student you fly a triangular route of 270 km stopping off at 2 other airfields en-route (and get a certificate signed at
each).
Unfortunately the wording is (as usual) ambiguous. It would appear to suggest that you have to complete the training
towards another PPL (but not ake the test). However, I believe it can also be interpretted as completing a formal training course which
was only a section of a full foreign licence course (i.e. as opposed to wanting to count various hours from 'pseudo sight seeing tours' with instructors
whilst abroad). The only people who can decide what it really means is the UK CAA, so don't spend any money on 'half courses'
in ICAO countries until you have definite answer from them as to whether it would count more than 10 hours.
You need form HO60 (I have a poor quality copy linked below - it works for me!) and the draw back rate (which, Oct 2005, is £0.281 per litre exported.)
Try this link for the current AVGAS
current Rate.
You fill in the form, attach fuel receipts for fuel loaded in the UK prior
to your flight, and send the forms and receipts to:
HM C&E, Mineral Oil Reliefs, Dobson House, Regent Centre, Gosforth, Newcastle, NE3 3PF
The form HO60 - I'll get a better quality copy, but in the meantime use these two separate pdfs to create one
double sided A4 form. This is page 1.
This is page 2 to print on the back of page 1.
Not if you have a basic UK issued PPL without additional IMC or instrument ratings.
Pilots confuse VFR with basic UK Air Law. If you have a basic UK issued PPL whether it is JAA or pre JAA,
your legal minimum anywhere is 3 km (it might be greater).
This is NOTHING to do with VFR, it's just that our Air Navigation Order says so. (If you have an NPPL with 'SSEA' (Simple Single Engine Aircraft) your minimum ever
is 5km, again, not due to VFR limitations, but because our ANO says so.)
Visual Flight Rules are set internationally
as a 'base' to be further over-ruled or adjusted by national air law.
Schedule 8 of our ANO gives the privileges of a basic PPL issued
in the UK, and it says NOT out of sight of the surface, and NOT in visibility of less than 3km.
So if you flew under a normal UK issued PPL with visibility at 2km, you could still be VFR depending on your altitude and
speed, but you would be breaking rules set by our ANO. The way to think of this is that being VFR does not exempt you from
other parts of Air Law. i.e: claiming you were 'VFR' is not an excuse, you wouldn't be accused of 'breaking VFR',
you'd be accused of breaking Air Law as per Schedule 8 of the ANO whilst you happened to be VFR.
If you still don't get it,
take a different idea altogether: If you were in CAVOK conditions at only 400' agl over the middle of a large city, you would be
VFR but you would NOT be legal - you would have broken 'Rule 5' of the ANO on low flying whilst you were VFR. It would be pointless
putting in a defence of the conditions being VFR. Equally, if you fly on a basic PPL at 2km, it's pointless defending yourself
by saying you were VFR, as it's an ANO regulation (not VFR) you have broken by being under 3km.
If you don't revalidate via the '12 hour route' (which include an hour with an instructor and the paperwork/signature
from an examiner before expiry), you have to do a test with an examiner, which is "fail-able".
What the test is called depends on when you do it - before expiry (and therefore replacing the 12 hour route altogther),
it's called an LPC - licence proficiency check. After expiry, it's called an LST - licence skills test.
Both an LPC and LPT used to be a "good club checkout" - a general handling test, but since Oct 28th 2004,
these tests must also contain navigation. The length of the nav leg is up to the examiner.
Here is the LPC or LPT content in pdf form.
This is the examiner check sheet, but you can ignore sections 3b and 6 for SEP LPC revalidations or LST renewals.
It contains some things you may not expect - "abandoned take off" for example.
It's only a paperwork and money exercise. Normally you must have had a valid JAA rating sometime within the previous 5 years, and you must have a JAA
medical which is valid on the first day of new licence issue (i.e.: the day after expiry of your old licence).
Within 60 days of your licence expiry, you print and fill in this
JAA licence document renewal form. Then you look up the
cost of a JAA PPL (or CPL) 5 year re-issue in this list
of CAA charges for either private or commercial licences. You then also print the CAA Payment Form.
(Thanks to Mike Cross for supplying the form links, saving me the bother!) Then you send the required
documents (as specified on the renewal form) with the two forms to the CAA with payment.
Try the danger area link on this NATS page which also has
the backups for NOTAM lists when the main notam checking site is down.
Try this for the index
but the chances are you will need to pay something when you submit your form, so there is also a general
'form to make any payment' form.
which accompanies the main form you send in! And you need to know how much (prices tend
to go up in April of each year, so you need the list
of CAA charges for either private or commercial licences.
Generalised Contents List
Contents Under Construction - available soon
Return to top of Questions List
Home Page Links:
Irv Lee's Home Page - Profile, Pre-Preflight Checklist, Frequently Asked (GA) Questions
and Other Useful Links
My Business Card
Contact Details
Thanks to WebCounter (www.digits.com) for counter support.